[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: usr1-signal, usr2-signal, etc.
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: usr1-signal, usr2-signal, etc. |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Dec 2006 23:26:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>>> On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 14:08:09 +0100, address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) said:
>
>>> Currently we only have usr1 and usr2 signals, but if we add more
>>> (the "etc") later, this would be a cleaner interface for such
>>> extensions.
>
>> For example, we could handle SIGTERM, SIGHUP, and SIGQUIT like this
>> to allow a user to handle those signals in some other way:
>
> I'm concerned about the case that kbd_buffer_store_event_hold is
> called from the signal-handler context while it is also executed in
> the normal context. This has already existed for SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2
> before your change, though.
SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2 are, IIRC, new in Emacs 22. So we have no "nobody
complained about that before" reason for allowing problems in that
manner.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- usr1-signal, usr2-signal, etc., Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/02
- Re: usr1-signal, usr2-signal, etc., Richard Stallman, 2006/12/04
- Re: usr1-signal, usr2-signal, etc., Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/04
- Re: usr1-signal, usr2-signal, etc., Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/04
- Re: usr1-signal, usr2-signal, etc., Richard Stallman, 2006/12/04
- Re: usr1-signal, usr2-signal, etc., YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2006/12/04
- Re: usr1-signal, usr2-signal, etc.,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: usr1-signal, usr2-signal, etc., Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/05
- Re: usr1-signal, usr2-signal, etc., YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2006/12/08
- Re: usr1-signal, usr2-signal, etc., Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/11
- Re: usr1-signal, usr2-signal, etc., YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2006/12/11
- Re: usr1-signal, usr2-signal, etc., Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/12
- Re: usr1-signal, usr2-signal, etc., YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2006/12/12
- Re: usr1-signal, usr2-signal, etc., Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/12
- Re: usr1-signal, usr2-signal, etc., YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2006/12/13
- Re: usr1-signal, usr2-signal, etc., Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/13
- Re: usr1-signal, usr2-signal, etc., YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2006/12/14