[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 49, Issue 33
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 49, Issue 33 |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Dec 2006 09:51:15 +0200 |
> Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 18:09:41 +0000
> From: Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>
> Subject: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/lispref/makefile.w32-in,v
> To: address@hidden
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
>
> CVSROOT: /cvsroot/emacs
> Module name: emacs
> Changes by: Juanma Barranquero <lektu> 06/12/07 18:09:41
>
> Index: makefile.w32-in
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/emacs/emacs/lispref/makefile.w32-in,v
> retrieving revision 1.17
> retrieving revision 1.18
> diff -u -b -r1.17 -r1.18
> --- makefile.w32-in 30 Oct 2006 14:15:57 -0000 1.17
> +++ makefile.w32-in 7 Dec 2006 18:09:41 -0000 1.18
> @@ -119,5 +119,5 @@
>
> distclean: clean
>
> -maintainer-clean: clean
> - - $(DEL) elisp elisp-* elisp.dvi elisp.oaux
> +maintainer-clean: distclean
> + - $(DEL) elisp.dvi elisp.oaux
>
Why did you make this change? lispref/Makefile.in still removes the
results of makeinfo, evidently to support a separate lispref
packaging. Why shouldn't makefile.w32-in follow suit?
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 49, Issue 33,
Eli Zaretskii <=