[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data?
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:07:04 -0500 |
No, I think instead that code that calls convert-standard-filename shouldn't
expect it to preserve the match-data.
It seems cleaner to me for a general subroutine, that does a job not
specifically related to searching or matching, to preserve the match
data, rather than making all its callers take care.
- convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data?, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/20
- Re: convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/12/20
- Re: convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data?, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/20
- Re: convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/12/25
- Re: convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/26
- Re: convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/12/27
- Re: convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2006/12/27
- Re: convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/12/27
- Re: convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2006/12/27
- Re: convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/12/29
- Re: convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2006/12/29