[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data?
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 23 Dec 2006 01:33:10 +0200 |
> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:07:04 -0500
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> No, I think instead that code that calls convert-standard-filename
> shouldn't
> expect it to preserve the match-data.
>
> It seems cleaner to me for a general subroutine, that does a job not
> specifically related to searching or matching, to preserve the match
> data, rather than making all its callers take care.
Done.
- convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data?, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/20
- Re: convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/12/20
- Re: convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data?, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/20
- Re: convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/21
- Re: convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/12/25
- Re: convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/26
- Re: convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/12/27
- Re: convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2006/12/27
- Re: convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/12/27
- Re: convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2006/12/27
- Re: convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/12/29
- Re: convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2006/12/29
- Re: convert-standard-filename on w32 does not preserve match-data?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/28