[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled |
Date: |
Fri, 2 Feb 2007 00:03:23 +0100 |
On 2/1/07, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
I clearly disagree. If there's no loop in your .emacs, then byte-compiling
won't bring you any benefit.
It's not about the code being faster, is about the .elc being smaller
(about 10% smaller) than the .el.
then you should most likely take those
things out of your .emacs and move them to a separate file/package.
Why? You prefer it that way, OK, do that. I don't like having lots of
small .el files loaded from .emacs; it's easier to maintain it
up-to-date between two or more computers when it's a single file.
/L/e/k/t/u
Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/01
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Chong Yidong, 2007/02/01
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/01
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/02
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/02
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/02/02
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/02
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/02/02
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/02
Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/02
Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/02
Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/01
Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/01