[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: constant `e'
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: constant `e' |
|
Date: |
Sat, 10 Feb 2007 12:41:09 -0500 |
Seriously, though, I'd really like to see an `otherwise'
constant (defined to `t', of course). That would make
catch-all clauses of `cond' look much better.
We won't do this, so please let's not spend time discussing it.
- Re: constant `e', (continued)
- Re: constant `e', Stuart D. Herring, 2007/02/12
- Re: constant `e', Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e', Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e', Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e', David Kastrup, 2007/02/11
- Re: constant `e', Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/11
- Re: constant `e', Edward O'Connor, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e', Stuart D. Herring, 2007/02/12
- Re: constant `e', Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/12
- Re: constant `e', David Kastrup, 2007/02/12
Re: constant `e',
Richard Stallman <=
Re: constant `e', Alan Mackenzie, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e', Jason Rumney, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e', Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e', Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e', David Hansen, 2007/02/10
- RE: constant `e', Drew Adams, 2007/02/10
Re: constant `e', Chong Yidong, 2007/02/10
Re: constant `e', djh, 2007/02/12