[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: constant `e'
|
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
|
Subject: |
Re: constant `e' |
|
Date: |
Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:23:35 +0100 (CET) |
> >> Despite being a maths graduate, I can't think of any other such
> >> constants with anything like the universality of e and pi.
> >
> > 42
>
> >Perhaps we should introduce the constant `math-42'.
>
> 42 is just the answer as I recall.
> I'm not convinced that it needs to have a contant definition.
Maybe it's possible that not all people know that this is a joke...
There are high chances that some of the list members haven't read the
`Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy'.
Werner
- Re: constant `e', (continued)
- Re: constant `e', Alan Mackenzie, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e', Jason Rumney, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e', Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e', Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e', David Hansen, 2007/02/10
- RE: constant `e', Drew Adams, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e', Chong Yidong, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e', djh, 2007/02/12
- Re: constant `e',
Werner LEMBERG <=