[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: --with-gtk as default?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: --with-gtk as default? |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:25:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.94 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:
> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> Such a waste. It's frustrating to advertise an editor that visually
>>>> appears to be stuck in the last millennium.
>>>
>>> Often less is more. (I only use more when I don't have less.)
>>
>> And your point was? Last time I looked, less did not have a less
>> sophisticated graphical interface than more.
>
> It has more functionality, but still a plain look.
Wrong. It will use the terminal application's widgets, and in that
way will blend in right with the desktop.
As opposed to Emacs.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, (continued)
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Nick Roberts, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, David Kastrup, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Kim F. Storm, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, David Kastrup, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Kim F. Storm, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, David Kastrup, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Romain Francoise, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Andreas Schwab, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, David Kastrup, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Andreas Schwab, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Ralf Angeli, 2007/02/28