Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time

[Lennart Borgman (gmail)]

Stuart D. Herring wrote:
> > Actually, a better test would be to put
> >
> >    (if (zerop (random 1)) (setq jit-lock-stealth-time nil))
> >
> > in your .emacs.  And then check the value of jit-lock-stealth-time every
> > time you notice a delay (after which, you'll want to restart jit-lock,
> > which basically means restart Emacs).
> >
> > This should bring the experiment a bit closer to the "double blind"
> > gold standard.
>
> Remember to seed your random number generator first!  (random t) is your
> friend.


It was not necessary in this particular case but would perhaps had made 
obfuscation better. ;-)