Re: A new(?) warning of erase-buffer, which was not seen before.

[Johan Bockgård]

Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:

> Ideally, you could keep undo information _only_ for user edits, and
> flush even that whenever the user submits a line of input to the
> subprocess (so once submitted, a command line would become "permanent").
>
> I've been working on some patches to comint to do this, by selectively
> disabling undo at various points, but it's not entirely straight-forward
> because you then have to fix up the undo list to account for the
> unrecorded buffer changes.

FWIW, erc.el does this kind of selective undo.

-- 
Johan Bockgård