[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Nonsensical byte compiler warning.

From: Markus Triska
Subject: Re: Nonsensical byte compiler warning.
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 07:44:25 +0200

Chong Yidong <address@hidden> writes:

> If the offending function name is unreliable, maybe we should omit
> it and issue a "value returned from form is not used" warning.  What
> do you think?

The function name and its starting position/interactive declaration
are quite reliable, and I find reporting them OK. If by "unreliable"
you mean that any form, even before the defun, could contain the
oversight/mistake of not using the return value, you are right. In my
experience, the innermost surrounding defun is an OK indicator though.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]