[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: misbehaviour of outline-backward-same-level]
From: |
Leo |
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: misbehaviour of outline-backward-same-level] |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:52:56 +0100 |
User-agent: |
No Gnus v0.6, Emacs/23.0.0.10 (2007-04-11), Fedora 6 gnu/linux |
----- Me (2007-04-13) wrote:-----
>> since there is no superior level for the top-level, the current
>> behavior seems reasonable. it is analogous to what happens when you
>> hold down `C-M-a' in ~/.emacs; it is coherent in that respect for the
>> general "go backward before first top-level" case. i see no need to
>> change it.
To see the consistency, compare:
| elisp | outline |
|-------+---------|
| C-M-a | C-c C-p |
| C-M-e | C-c C-n |
So now I believe...
> However, C-M-e can then move back to the defun while C-c C-f
> ('outline-forward-same-level') won't, i.e. users are trapped in the
> area above the first heading.
>
> So it needs fixing, one way or the other. But for consistency, fixing
> C-c C-f is acceptable also.
the behavior with Chong's patch is more correct.
--
Leo <sdl.web AT gmail.com> (GPG Key: 9283AA3F)