Re: Emacs manual mentioning thumbs mode but not tumme

[Mathias Dahl]

> > don't think they were very good ones. The name, for example, could be
> > changed. We could have an alias called `thumbs' which would call
>
> That would be a good idea.

BTW, I'm curious, is there something offending by the word "tumme"? I
made a quick google search and could not find anything special. I
agree that "thumbs" is better, of course, or at least easier to
find/guess.

> I'll give you an example: I, personally, prefer the way tumme handles
> the images when the size is bigger than the display buffer, it fits
> the image to the buffer size.  thumbs is displaying the image in the
> original resolution, I'm damn sure that there are users out there who
> would prefer it the thumbs' way.

Then they could use C-u RET instead of just RET :)

> But then: So are your arguments for removing the packages 8-).
> thumbs.el is small and therefore would not eat lots of resources (I
> guess).

I'm not very concerned about disk space, I was mostly thinking about
maintenace resources, but I won't argue about that anymore as we
clearly have different opinions.

/Mathias