[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: REDO ?
From: |
Davis Herring |
Subject: |
Re: REDO ? |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:54:09 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.8-4.el3.2lanl |
> Now it should be possible to apply a redo.
>
> M-- M-1 C-/ => Undo!
>
> M-- M-1 C-/ is sufficiently inconvenient that I doubt
> it is worth having.
Just as a comment on the key, C-- C-_ would have the same effect with a
somewhat less frustrating typing effort.
Davis
--
This product is sold by volume, not by mass. If it appears too dense or
too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during
shipping.
- Re: REDO ?, A Soare, 2007/04/23
- Re: REDO ?, A Soare, 2007/04/23
- Re: REDO ?, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/24
- Re: REDO ?, David Reitter, 2007/04/24
- Re: REDO ?, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/24
Re: REDO ?, A Soare, 2007/04/24