Re: unicode-2 and multitty

[Kim F. Storm]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>> Maybe you don't need to import the multitty changes as a branch
>> in CVS.  I suppose that the changes can be committed directly on the
>> TRUNK as a (big) set of changes.
>
> I might be sufficient, but I think it might also be worthwhile to first
> commit it on a separate branch and then try and merge it.
> It just seems conceptually cleaner, leaving a clear and recognizable trace
> of the branch before it was merged.

For that, you can just put a "BEFORE_MULTITTY_MERGE" tag on the trunk.

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk