[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Post-22.1 development?
From: |
Jan Djärv |
Subject: |
Re: Post-22.1 development? |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Jun 2007 20:06:21 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070604) |
Richard Stallman skrev:
> Some things may be worth adressing, but I think mostly this is the same
> "If it
> isn't Gnome, it sucks"-attitude that Gnome people seem to have.
>
> I don't think we should adopt an attitude of the form "If it isn't
> Gnome, it sucks", but better integration with Gnome is a good thing.
> And some Gnome dialogs might be substantially more convenient than the
> current Emacs facilities. Thus, supporting the Gnome dialogs might be
> an improvement in general, as well as an improvement in coherence.
>
It would probably mean that some stuff that are available with Gtk/Gnome won't
be for other ports (i.e. Lucid, Lesstif, basic X11). Some things alredy are
different, but I suspect the divergence will be greater. Maybe this isn't
such a big deal.
Jan D.
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, (continued)
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/06
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/06/05
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/05
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/06
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Nick Roberts, 2007/06/06
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Jan Djärv, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Miles Bader, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Jan Djärv, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Nick Roberts, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/08
- Re: Post-22.1 development?,
Jan Djärv <=
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Tom Tromey, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David House, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Tom Tromey, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Jan Djärv, 2007/06/08
- IPP under emacs [was: Re: Post-22.1 development?], Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2007/06/08
- Re: IPP under emacs [was: Re: Post-22.1 development?], Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2007/06/08
- Re: IPP under emacs [was: Re: Post-22.1 development?], Ken Raeburn, 2007/06/08
- Re: IPP under emacs [was: Re: Post-22.1 development?], Jason Rumney, 2007/06/08
- Re: IPP under emacs [was: Re: Post-22.1 development?], Ken Raeburn, 2007/06/08
- Re: IPP under emacs [was: Re: Post-22.1 development?], Jason Rumney, 2007/06/08