Re: feature request: indicator of minibuffer-recursion depth

[Andreas Röhler]

Am Freitag, 15. Juni 2007 20:39 schrieb Stefan Monnier:
> >> There is no reason to add code in C when it is possible to do the same
> >> thing in Emacs Lisp.
> >
> > Fragility.  My minibuffer-setup-hook already has eight functions.
>
> AFAIK, the number of elements on this hook doesn't have any impact
> on fragility.
>
> I haven't looked in detail, but unless the Elisp code needs to go through
> funny contortions to do its job, it looks like a better option.
>
>
>         Stefan
>
>

Herewith a red-nosed users view in this discussion:

If in a programm it's expected, users will write their
own derived functions from it, I'd prefer elisp, in all
other cases C.

As minibuffer-stuff seems rather an Emacs internal
matter, I'd opt for C.

Thanks to all

Andreas Roehler