[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Multiple major modes
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Multiple major modes |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Jul 2007 13:21:25 -0400 |
I now see that my previous concerns were misguided.
(I had misunderstood what the feature does.)
This feature doesn't cause a problem like that of advice.
It seems like basically a good idea.
I do have a criticism of one part of the API, though.
(defun semantic-analyze-split-name-default (name)
"Don't split up NAME by default."
name)
It seems like a mistake to make the API depend on manipulating symbol
names. I'd rather have a separate construct to define the default
meaning, giving the standard name, here `semantic-analyze-split-name'.
How does it actually work?
- RE: Multiple major modes, (continued)
- RE: Multiple major modes, Drew Adams, 2007/07/06
- Re: Multiple major modes, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/07
- Re: Multiple major modes, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/07/07
- Re: Multiple major modes, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/08
- Re: Multiple major modes, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/07/09
- Re: Multiple major modes, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/09
- Re: Multiple major modes, Johan Bockgård, 2007/07/06
Re[2]: Multiple major modes, Eric M. Ludlam, 2007/07/04
Re: Multiple major modes, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/01