Re: Scratch buffer annoyance

[Miles Bader]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>>> I don't see a better name.  Maybe, `initial-display-buffer' or
>>> `initial-current-buffer'?
>
>> `initial-buffer-name'
>
> Since it's not a name, that's probably not the best choice either.
> How 'bout initial-buffer-content?  initial-buffer-target?
> initial-buffer-specification?

Oh, whoops... :-)

Yeah, then I agree, `initial-buffer-contents' seems best.

-Miles

-- 
`Life is a boundless sea of bitterness'