Re: Info about available CVS/Arch/Git branches

[dhruva]

Hi,

On 8/20/07, Miles Bader <address@hidden> wrote:
> dhruva <address@hidden> writes:
> > I am quite prejudiced when it comes to using CYGWIN.
>
> What does that mean??

Having used MKS toolkit and MinGW, I personally feel they are much
faster as they do not need an emulation layer (based on limited usage
and knowledge). Even AT&T UWIN out performed other equivalents. The
fork implementation in UWIN was far superior (similar to MS-SFU).

-dky

-- 
Dhruva Krishnamurthy
Contents reflect my personal views only!