[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vc-dired
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
Re: vc-dired |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Aug 2007 18:51:06 -0700 (PDT) |
Masatake YAMATO <address@hidden> writes:
> > > I was interested in merge DVC to GNU Emacs. However, these days, I am
> > > busy and I get interests to extend vc-dired, so I've just asked DVC
> > > developers to assign another people for working on the merging task.
> >
> > Given that you are interested in vc-dired, can you please look into
> > these issues:
> >
> > - pass --ignore= to ls so that it does not recurse into things like
> > .svn directories
> >
> > - If vc-dired dot show any files it displays the message: "No files
> > locked under DIRNAME". I suppose the "locked" terminology comes from
> > RCS, and it probably does not mean anything to most people
> > nowadays.
>
> O.K. I'll take a look for these issues.
> Give me time. A bit busy now.
Here's another issue to consider:
This code in vc-dired-hook:
;; ordinary file
((and (vc-backend filename)
(not (and vc-dired-terse-mode
(vc-up-to-date-p filename))))
(vc-dired-reformat-line (vc-call dired-state-info filename))
(forward-line 1))
Is the vc-backend call necessary? It ends up calling vc-registered and
that can be expensive for the backends that run a program to determine
that. The -dir-state method computes the state for most (all?)
files...
I don't understand this code very well, but if it can be simplified,
it might result in a significant speedup for vc-dired.
Can you please take a look?
Thanks
--dan
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: vc-dired,
Dan Nicolaescu <=