[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 23.0.50; delete vs deletechar
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
Re: 23.0.50; delete vs deletechar |
Date: |
Sun, 02 Sep 2007 15:30:24 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
raman <address@hidden>, "T. V. Raman" wrote:
> I suspect the multi-tty patch again, but [delete] has now changed
> to deletechar.
Not sure what you mean. In Emacs 22 I get:
C-d (translated from <delete>) runs the command delete-char
which is an interactive built-in function in `C source code'.
It is bound to C-d, <deletechar>.
(delete-char N &optional KILLFLAG)
In Emacs CVS before and after multi-tty merge, I get the same, except
that C-d, <deletechar> have changed order. Does this matter?
C-d (translated from <delete>) runs the command delete-char
which is an interactive built-in function in `C source code'.
It is bound to <deletechar>, C-d.
(delete-char N &optional KILLFLAG)
- 23.0.50; delete vs deletechar, raman, 2007/09/01
- Re: 23.0.50; delete vs deletechar,
Glenn Morris <=
- Re: 23.0.50; delete vs deletechar, T. V. Raman, 2007/09/02
- Re: 23.0.50; delete vs deletechar, Glenn Morris, 2007/09/03
- Re: 23.0.50; delete vs deletechar, T. V. Raman, 2007/09/03
- Re: 23.0.50; delete vs deletechar, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/03
- Re: 23.0.50; delete vs deletechar, T. V. Raman, 2007/09/03
- Re: 23.0.50; delete vs deletechar, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/04
- Re: 23.0.50; delete vs deletechar, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/09/03
- Re: 23.0.50; delete vs deletechar, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/04
- Re: 23.0.50; delete vs deletechar, Stefan Monnier, 2007/09/04
- Re: 23.0.50; delete vs deletechar, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/05