[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: warning about undo info being discarded when in *Backtrace*
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: warning about undo info being discarded when in *Backtrace* |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:45:53 -0700 |
> > 3. For this particular warning, does it make sense to repeat the warning
> > all? If undo was disabled in *Backtrace*, then it is still
> disabled, no? I
> > might be mistaken here, however: It's possible that each warning was
> > issued
> > after the *Backtrace* was entered anew. The warning would presumably be
> > issued only when undo was enabled and it became disabled.
>
> When the undo info is discarded, undo remains enabled in the affected
> buffer. Future large changes thus cause it to be discarded again.
I see. I think I misread "discarded" for "disabled". Perhaps the verbose
version of the warning could explicitly mention that undo is still enabled,
so future undo info will be retained.