[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:42:54 +0200 |
On 10/10/07, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
> I will rewrite the doc string.
Thanks.
> The idea makes sense, but it would be an incompatible change. A
> compatible change with a similar effect is to move the usual
> processing into a separate function which the hook can call.
> Want to do that?
I think Davis Herring has made a compelling argument that the current
behavior is confusing and the new one could be implemented with minor
incompatibilities, if any.
Juanma
- Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts, (continued)
- Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts, Davis Herring, 2007/10/23
- Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/24
- Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts, Davis Herring, 2007/10/11
- Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/11
- Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts, David Kastrup, 2007/10/25
- Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/28
Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/10
- Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts,
Juanma Barranquero <=