[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Manual policy (Re: Emacs-devel Digest, Vol 44, Issue 65)
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Manual policy (Re: Emacs-devel Digest, Vol 44, Issue 65) |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:46:44 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> > Recommending GNU arch is dubious considering Arch's poorly-maintained
>> > and poorly-documented state. If I'm not mistaken, Arch has been
>> > effectively moribund since about 2003.
Let's see what we currently support:
(RCS CVS SVN SCCS Bzr Git Hg Mtn Arch MCVS)
[with DaRCS being hopefully added soon]
Of those, when starting a new project, I wouldn't want to recommend any one
in particular: they all have their strength and weaknesses. I don't think
it's our role to pimp one over another. And given the fact that Emacs
provides no particular support to start a project under either of those VCS
anyway, I think we should simply punt on this issue.
Stefan
- Manual policy (Re: Emacs-devel Digest, Vol 44, Issue 65), Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/10
- Re: Manual policy (Re: Emacs-devel Digest, Vol 44, Issue 65), Manoj Srivastava, 2007/10/10
- Re: Manual policy (Re: Emacs-devel Digest, Vol 44, Issue 65), Jason Rumney, 2007/10/10
- Re: Manual policy (Re: Emacs-devel Digest, Vol 44, Issue 65),
Stefan Monnier <=