Re: byte compiler warnings when bootstrapping

[Stefan Monnier]

>     The intention is for the byte-compiler to take the intersection of the
>     functions defined by <feature> and the functions used in the file being
>     byte-compiled.

> This requires it to know which functions are defined by that feature.
> In other words, compilation would have to USE the table produced
> by the batch process.

Well there would be no separate batch process for it: it's only a change in
the byte-compiler which will treate require-lazy as a normal require during
compilation (i.e. it will load the file during compilation) but will replace
the `require-lazy' by a bunch of autoloads in the .elc file.

It's a different feature than the one you imagine.  Both might be useful.


        Stefan