[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mark-word
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: mark-word |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:26:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:
> Andreas Röhler writes:
>
> > If mark-word is called while inside a word, it marks
> > from this point until the end of word first AFAIS, thus
> > leaving the first part of the word unmarked.
>
> > IMO marking the word-at-point completely then would be
> > a more convenient behaviour.
>
> `mark-word' itself should remain compatible with `kill-word' and
> `mark-sexp'. I think it would be a good idea to have a
> `mark-entire-word' command and bind it to M-@, especially since C-@
> doesn't mark a character. Ditto `mark-entire-sexp' and address@hidden
Since "mark whole ..." for both directions is useful for more than
words, I think it would be more useful to have a prefix for that.
C-u C-u feels natural for "both directions", but to make it
non-surprising, one would likely have to assign separate meaning to C-u
(as opposed to C-u 4). So probably rather C-u address@hidden
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- mark-word, Andreas Röhler, 2007/11/14
- mark-word, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/14
- Re: mark-word, Leo, 2007/11/14
- Re: mark-word,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: mark-word, Andreas Röhler, 2007/11/14
- Re: mark-word, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/14
- Re: mark-word, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/11/14
- Re: mark-word, Miles Bader, 2007/11/14
- Re: mark-word, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/11/15
- Re: mark-word, Miles Bader, 2007/11/15
- Re: mark-word, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/11/15
- Re: mark-word, Andreas Röhler, 2007/11/15
- Re: mark-word, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/14