[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "simplifications"
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: "simplifications" |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:47:58 +0100 |
On Nov 19, 2007 4:44 PM, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
> Well, my optimization is not specific to defsubst, so it will also
> remove the let-binding in:
>
> (let ((debug-on-error t))
> (car (car (cdr x))))
Why? There can be no dynamic bindings under that optimization?
> In any case, if you want a "fast and loose" defsubst, it's there already
> under the name defsubst*.
I'll remember it. Thanks again.
Juanma
- "simplifications", David Kastrup, 2007/11/19
- Re: "simplifications", Juanma Barranquero, 2007/11/19
- Re: "simplifications", Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/19
- Re: "simplifications", David Kastrup, 2007/11/19
- Re: "simplifications", Juanma Barranquero, 2007/11/19
- Re: "simplifications", Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/19
- Re: "simplifications",
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: "simplifications", Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/19
- Re: "simplifications", Juanma Barranquero, 2007/11/19
- Re: "simplifications", Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/19
- Re: "simplifications", David Kastrup, 2007/11/19
- Re: "simplifications", Juanma Barranquero, 2007/11/19
- Re: "simplifications", Richard Stallman, 2007/11/19
- Re: "simplifications", Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/20
- Re: "simplifications", Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/21
- Re: "simplifications", David Kastrup, 2007/11/21
- Re: "simplifications", Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/21