[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: initial nxml merge
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: initial nxml merge |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:25:59 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> I have just merged a minimally tested nXML. I merged all the
> char-name/unicode/*.el files for now because, while this information is
> in the unicode branch, it isn't in HEAD.
>
> Is clear that the char-name/unicode/* files are not needed in
> unicode-2?
>
> If so, let's delete them now from the trunk. We're not going to make
> a release before merging in unicode-2.
The trunk is our testbed. We don't want to have an extended time window
with broken and unfixable code in it. Let us delete them when the merge
is done, or at least when it is immediately imminent.
Otherwise, people won't be able to use any version of nxml-mode until
unicode-2 is merged. In that case, we are better off removing nxml-mode
altogether for now in the trunk rather than keep a non-operative version
for an extended duration. It can still be placed in unicode-2 now if it
is expected to work there.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- initial nxml merge, Mark A. Hershberger, 2007/11/23
- Re: initial nxml merge, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2007/11/23
- Re: initial nxml merge, Romain Francoise, 2007/11/23
- Re: initial nxml merge, Glenn Morris, 2007/11/23
- Re: initial nxml merge, Richard Stallman, 2007/11/23
- Re: initial nxml merge,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: initial nxml merge, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/11/24
- Re: What happened to (defun x)?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/11/24
- Re: What happened to (defun x)?, Jay Belanger, 2007/11/24