[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Using `call-process-shell-command' in `process-lines'
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Using `call-process-shell-command' in `process-lines' |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:04:46 +0100 |
On Nov 26, 2007 4:35 PM, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
> Yes: the use of `args' in call-process-shell-command is strongly
> discouraged in my office because it doesn't do what it says it does: it
> doesn't treat each element of the list as an argument. Instead it just
> concatenates the elements of the list and then passes the resulting
> single string to the shell which will split it into arguments accoring
> to its own rules.
Aside: that shouldn't cause compatibility problems, because
`process-lines' wasn't in subr.el until 2007-11-19; I don't think
there were many users of `process-line' from admin/admin.el or of
`authors-process-lines' in emacs-lisp/authors.el. But I could be
wrong...
Juanma
- Re: Using `call-process-shell-command' in `process-lines', (continued)
- Re: Using `call-process-shell-command' in `process-lines', Eli Zaretskii, 2007/11/26
- Re: Using `call-process-shell-command' in `process-lines', Jason Rumney, 2007/11/26
- Re: Using `call-process-shell-command' in `process-lines', Eli Zaretskii, 2007/11/26
- Re: Using `call-process-shell-command' in `process-lines', Eli Zaretskii, 2007/11/26
- Re: Using `call-process-shell-command' in `process-lines', Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/26
- Re: Using `call-process-shell-command' in `process-lines', Eli Zaretskii, 2007/11/26
- Re: Using `call-process-shell-command' in `process-lines', Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/11/26
Re: Using `call-process-shell-command' in `process-lines',
Juanma Barranquero <=