[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:36:58 -0500
Would someone please look at this bug, and ack?
From: Tassilo Horn <address@hidden>
Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
Subject: Re: comment-add
Mail-Followup-To: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 21:34:54 +0100
In-Reply-To: <address@hidden> (Richard Stallman's message
of "Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:00:41 -0500")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> To help me reproduce the problem, could you please post a *precise*
> test case for this bug?
1. emacs -Q
2. Goto buffer *scratch*
3. M-x outline-minor-mode
(defun foo ()
The "(defun foo ()" is matched by outline-regexp.
5. Mark the whole function foo and do M-x comment-region. This results
;;; (defun foo ()
Now the ";;; (defun foo ()" is still matched by outline-regexp. That's
the difference between the new default comment-style `indent-or-triple'
and the old default `indent'.
> Also please say exactly what incorrect results you get.
I don't know if having differences in what commented text is matched by
outline-regexp qualifies as a bug, but ideally switching comment-style
shouldn't change that. So the comment-style `indent-or-triple' should
ensure that ;;; is followed by more than one space if it starts at