[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: merging the unicode-2 branch
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: merging the unicode-2 branch |
Date: |
Sat, 05 Jan 2008 17:29:34 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> Then, for instance, I can know (or recall) that the function
>> is intentionally coded to work in the PT != GTP case.
> That is supposed to be written in a comment. A change log is not a good
> replacement.
There's theory and then there's practice: I agree that it "should" be in
a comment, but experience shows that often people don't think hard
enough about what to put in a changelog and what to put in comments, so
the changelog is often a necessary crutch (which can also be used to
improve the comments in the code, after the fact).
Stefan
- Re: Selection-set editing without VC-dired, (continued)
- merging the unicode-2 branch (was: Re: Selection-set editing without VC-dired), Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/01/03
- Re: merging the unicode-2 branch (was: Re: Selection-set editing without VC-dired), Richard Stallman, 2008/01/06
- Re: merging the unicode-2 branch, Miles Bader, 2008/01/06
- Re: merging the unicode-2 branch, Nick Roberts, 2008/01/07
- Re: merging the unicode-2 branch, David Kastrup, 2008/01/07
- Re: merging the unicode-2 branch, Miles Bader, 2008/01/07