Re: Emacs-devel Digest, Vol 47, Issue 14

[Sascha Wilde]

David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:

> "Eric S. Raymond" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I second this recommendation.  I am not yet sure Mercurial is the
>> overall best-of-breed, but it is the most accessible of the big three
>> (git, bzr, hg) and seems to have the best UI design.
>
> Before making a decision, one should try the candidates on the Emacs
> repository data which will constitute our real workload.

FWIW: I maintain an hg mirror of emacs head and my personal emacs branch
here:  http://hg.intevation.org/
so testing mercurial with real world Emacs data is simple...

cheers
sascha
-- 
Sascha Wilde   -.-. ..- .-. .. --- ... .. - -.-- 
               -.- .. .-.. .-.. . -.. 
               - .... .
               -.-. .- -