[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: State of VC?
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: State of VC? |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:03:21 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
() Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden>
() Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:56:24 -0800
AFAIK no.
I have just added vc-dir-status for Git. Sigh, moments after
the C-c C-c, i see new func vc-git--ls-files-state, which
probably could have been useful. However, before doing any
more munging, it would be nice for us to figure out what is
vc-dir-status philosophy and design, and write that down in a
vc.el comment so that backend support can derive guidance and
check for conformance. Labeling everything EXPERIMENTAL is
lame; one such warning in vc.el should suffice.
Personally, i don't think vc-directory for Git is that bad
(w/ some tweaking)[0]. I *like* the "v" prefix, non-flat
(visible) directory hierarchy, and support for RCS and CVS.
I get the feeling that vc-dir-status is simply ewoc wanking.
Perhaps a nice comment in vc.el would dispell that, hint hint.
thi
__________________________________________________________
[0] mentioned before, but there have been updates since:
http://www.gnuvola.org/wip/ (see vc-git-hacking)
- Re: State of VC?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/02/17
- Re: State of VC?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/02/17
- Re: State of VC?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/02/17
- Re: State of VC?,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=
- Re: State of VC?, Miles Bader, 2008/02/18
- Re: State of VC?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/02/18
- Re: State of VC?, Miles Bader, 2008/02/18
- Re: State of VC?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/02/18
- Re: State of VC?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/02/25
- Re: State of VC?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/02/18
- Re: State of VC?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/02/19
- Re: State of VC?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/02/19
- Re: State of VC?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/02/19
- Re: State of VC?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/02/19