Re: lexbind

[Miles Bader]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
>     > I am not sure `defvar' is enough.  The reason is that using it to fix
>     > existing packages may require renaming.
>
>     Yes, it may require renaming.  It's usually not a big deal, tho.
>
> I think we would be better off also having other mechanisms
> for doing this, which do not require renaming.

Could you give a concrete example of what you're talking about?

-Miles

-- 
Occam's razor split hairs so well, I bought the whole argument!