[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: position on changing defaults?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: position on changing defaults? |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:49:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I can not see what the advantage with an interactive spec over a
>> property on the function name is. Could you please tell?
>>
>> The interactive spec is where you specify other things about how to
>> call the function interactively. So it is a cleaner interface to put
>> this in the same place.
>
> What about commands which have a lisp form as interactive spec?
I fail to see the point you are trying to make.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: position on changing defaults?, (continued)
- Re: position on changing defaults?, David Kastrup, 2008/03/13
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Kim F. Storm, 2008/03/13
- Re: position on changing defaults?, David Kastrup, 2008/03/13
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/03/13
- Re: position on changing defaults?, David Kastrup, 2008/03/13
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/03/13
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/13
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Kim F. Storm, 2008/03/13
- Re: position on changing defaults?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/14
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/03/13
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Chong Yidong, 2008/03/13