Re: Usability suggestion : completion for M-:

[Stefan Monnier]

>     How necessary is it today to have *by default* C-i bound to TAB (and
>     C-m bound to RET).

> I thin both indentation and completion are important enough to be on
> TAB, not C-i.

> In any case, we should not change such a thing without polling the users.

Since under ttys, TAB and C-i are usually indistinguishable, I'd rather
not being them to different commands, since that would only work
on GUIs.


        Stefan