emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [BUG][PATCH] emacs23, make bootstrap failed on x86_64 systems


From: Dan Kruchinin
Subject: Re: [BUG][PATCH] emacs23, make bootstrap failed on x86_64 systems
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 13:46:18 +0400
User-agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080109)

Andreas Schwab wrote:
Dan Kruchinin <address@hidden> writes:

But it'll never return false on _LP64 systems(on which EMACS_INT is long
and sizeof(long) == 8),
because it uses low bitwise operations expecting that sizeof(EMACS_INT) ==
4:

--- src/editfns.c: lisp_time_argument ---
     *result = (XINT (high) << 16) + (XINT (low) & 0xffff);
     return *result >> 16 == XINT (high);

Where does this assume a 32bit EMACS_INT?

Andreas.

I looked more closely at src/editfns.c and how it works with date and time, so
1st: yep, my patch was invalid
2nd:
All functions use int data type for holding seconds. Here for example code from current-time
function:

--
 EMACS_TIME t;

 EMACS_GET_TIME (t);
 return list3 (make_number ((EMACS_SECS (t) >> 16) & 0xffff),
     make_number ((EMACS_SECS (t) >> 0)  & 0xffff),
     make_number (EMACS_USECS (t)));
--

or from get-internal-run-time:
--
int secs, usecs;
...
 return list3 (make_number ((secs >> 16) & 0xffff),
     make_number ((secs >> 0)  & 0xffff),
     make_number (usecs));
--

It implies that both HIGH and LOW have size = 2 bytes.
It also implies that they are not depend on how big is int: 32 or 64 bits.

But in the function lisp_time_argument 'high' can be greater than 2 bytes
because XINT(high) returns long(8 bytes on _LP64) and
"*result = (XINT (high) << 16) + (XINT (low) & 0xffff)"
will not truncate it because 'result' has type time_t which can be > than 4 bytes. (8 bytes on _LP64).

Something like this seems to be valid:
"*result = ((XINT (high) & 0xffff) << 16) + (XINT (low) & 0xffff);"
or like this:
"*result &= 0xffffffff;"

Anyway if "seconds" have some size restriction, lisp_time_argument should check it correctly.

W.B.R.
Dan Kruchinin.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]