Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le

[Stephen J. Turnbull]

Eli Zaretskii writes:

 > Maybe it is (I didn't yet have time to look at the code), but there
 > could be a good reason for that.  If it's so easy to recognize the
 > BOM, why do we need versions with and without it?

I don't know, in fact I think I think it's a bad idea.  That's what
the part of my message that you snipped was saying.  But I'll have to
defer to Handa-san on that.