[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le

From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Subject: Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:32:42 +0900

Eli Zaretskii writes:

 > Maybe it is (I didn't yet have time to look at the code), but there
 > could be a good reason for that.  If it's so easy to recognize the
 > BOM, why do we need versions with and without it?

I don't know, in fact I think I think it's a bad idea.  That's what
the part of my message that you snipped was saying.  But I'll have to
defer to Handa-san on that.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]