[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 06:20:20 +0300

> From: Juri Linkov <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:30:41 +0300
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> Unfortunately, now in Emacs 23 I see no BOM marks displayed at the
> beginning of the buffer.  I think Emacs should have a visual indication
> for such hidden characters.

Emacs behaves correctly IMO, since its behavior is tuned for reading
text, and BOM is not part of the text.  If you want to debug the
programs that generated that text, you can always use no-conversion or

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]