[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le

From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Subject: Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 05:09:53 +0900

Stefan Monnier writes:

 > We could use an approach similar to non-breaking space, where the BOM is
 > made visible just like any other char, with a special face.

The BOM is not part of the text in a file, it is part of a
higher-level protocol.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]