[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le

From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Subject: Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 02:20:47 +0900

Jan Djärv writes:

 > In recode they have "surfaces".  So charset is separate from surfaces, for 
 > example EOL convention.  That would be nice to have in Emacs as well.

Do you know how recode's terminology maps to Unicode TR #17?  (If you
don't know what I'm talking about, please disregard; I just never
figured out what "surfaces" were and wouldn't mind a free clue.)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]