Re: testing for a remote file to include file on a Windows mapped drive

[Stefan Monnier]

>> This may require some changes in file-relative-name, because this one
>> does use file-remote-p in a more specific way, but everything else I've
>> looked at uses file-remote-p as a way to test "fast&reliable or not".

> Like I said, it's a mystery to me why you insist on changing
> file-remote-p for a different semantics.

I'm saying it's not a different semantics.  It's nothing more than
a bug fix.  That `file-remote-p on an sshfs filesystem returns nil is
a bug.


        Stefan