[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el]
|
From: |
Roland Winkler |
|
Subject: |
Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el] |
|
Date: |
Sat, 24 May 2008 02:51:34 +0200 |
On Fri May 23 2008 Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Well, maybe at least consider refactoring the current Lisp code so
> that the code which relies on `ps' is limited to a few functions with
> well-defined interfaces. Then someone else could reimplement them in
> a portable fashion.
That's what I try anyway.
- docstrings in dired.el, Roland Winkler, 2008/05/23
- Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el], Richard M Stallman, 2008/05/24
- Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el], Eli Zaretskii, 2008/05/24
- Re: proced.el, Stefan Monnier, 2008/05/24
- Re: proced.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/05/24
- Re: proced.el, Stefan Monnier, 2008/05/24
Re: docstrings in dired.el, Richard M Stallman, 2008/05/23