RE: C-M-TAB stand-in for M-TAB, on MS Windows?

[Drew Adams]

> >> Usually C-M-i is effectively M-TAB though?
> >> (Since traditionally ^i => TAB)
> > 
> > That suggestion was in the archives. IMO, it's not very 
> > helpful in this context that TAB is C-i - that provides
> > little more than a pun or mnemonic here.
> 
> But N.B. at least on X (can't test windoze), C-M-i 
> currently works the same as "real" M-TAB in isearch etc.
> (unlike ESC TAB).  What does it do on windoze?

It works on Windows also. Thanks for pointing that out.
I still think it would be good to also bind C-M-tab to this.