[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs

From: Dan Nicolaescu
Subject: Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 20:00:21 -0700

Nick Roberts <address@hidden> writes:

  >  > > In that case, do you think [it was] premature to remove vc-directory 
  >  > > was better at doing some of the things vc-dir should do?
  >  > 
  >  > AFAIK, it has the same "commit in foreground" and "no way to update the
  >  > whole direcrory" problem.  VC-dir is missing some features, but which
  >  > ones (other than the obvious ones from dired which probably won't be
  >  > added to vc-dir anyway) were present in vc-dired?
  >  vc-dir isn't documented (but vc-directory is)...

Actually, ESR updated the documentation a few weeks ago.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]