[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Font backend: Observations on speed on Windows
From: |
Óscar Fuentes |
Subject: |
Re: Font backend: Observations on speed on Windows |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:15:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (windows-nt) |
Jason Rumney <address@hidden> writes:
> Óscar Fuentes wrote:
>> Today I fired a fresh CVS Emacs and, with great surprise, noticed that
>> the screen is painted with acceptable speed on my old 550 MHz
>> machine. The second odd thing is that the font used was not the one I
>> expected. Emacs was using
>>
>> -raster-MS Sans Serif-normal-normal-normal-sans-16-*-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1
>>
>> so I changed the default font to
>>
>> -outline-Courier New-normal-normal-normal-mono-16-*-*-*-c-*-iso8859-1
>>
>> and the slowness manifested again. It is my impression that it is not so
>> bad as some weeks ago, though.
>>
>
> Does the display become similarly fast when anti-aliasing is disabled,
> even with the Courier New font?
How do I disable anti-aliasing? (This is Windows2K)
> How is it with other truetype fonts, particularly sans serif ones,
> which are less likely to overspill the character cell boundaries when
> antialiased?
The list of available fonts is quite short. I tried this:
-outline-DejaVu Sans Mono-normal-normal-normal-mono-16-*-*-*-c-*-iso8859-1
and the rendering speed is not worse, although it is not obvious that is
better than Courier New. Sorry, can't be more precise. Can you recommend
a method for measuring font rendering speed on Emacs, so I can give
accurate reports?
--
Oscar