[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
line-move-visual never set to nil?
From: |
T. V. Raman |
Subject: |
line-move-visual never set to nil? |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:43:01 -0700 |
I'm very confused by the code in simple.el.
As reported a few minutes ago, turning off visual-line-mode has
no effect. The apparent reason being: line-move-visual remains
set to T and that is what the code in functions next-line and
previous-line refers to.
Is this a naming bug i.e. with the minor mode now called
visual-line-mode, should the variable be named visual-line-move
-- rather than line-move-visual?
Looking at the code that defines visual-line-mode -- I dont see
the line-move-visual getting set at any point; also, I see a
command to turn-on-visual-line-mode -- but no corresponding
command to turn it off.
Setting line-move-visual to nil does return emacs to its
traditional behavior where next-line and previous-line move
across physical lines.
--
Best Regards,
--raman
Email: address@hidden
WWW: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/
AIM: emacspeak GTalk: address@hidden
PGP: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc
Google: tv+raman
IRC: irc://irc.freenode.net/#emacs
- line-move-visual never set to nil?,
T. V. Raman <=