[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: place to send build failure reports?
From: |
Chong Yidong |
Subject: |
Re: place to send build failure reports? |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Aug 2008 11:58:04 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:
> TZ> Stefan or Chong, can you suggest a place to send the build failure
> TZ> reports?
>
> Ping... The note was buried at the end of a message last time :)
I would suggest sending it to the private email of whoever volunteers to
handle this. Then, when a build fails, that volunteer would forward the
email to emacs-devel.
(The human intervention is to prevent unnecessary spam from
malfunctioning buildbots, repeated build failures during tree merges,
etc.)
- Re: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this?, (continued)
- Re: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this?, Romain Francoise, 2008/08/01
- Re: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this?, Ted Zlatanov, 2008/08/01
- Re: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/08/02
- Re: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this?, Ted Zlatanov, 2008/08/04
- Re: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/08/04
- Message not available
- Re: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this?, Ted Zlatanov, 2008/08/04
- Re: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/08/05
- buildbots (was: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this?), Ted Zlatanov, 2008/08/05
- buildbots (was: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this?), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/08/05
- place to send build failure reports? (was: buildbots), Ted Zlatanov, 2008/08/08
- Re: place to send build failure reports?,
Chong Yidong <=
- Re: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this?, Romain Francoise, 2008/08/03
- Re: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this?, Ted Zlatanov, 2008/08/04