[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vc-git bug with top-level repositories
From: |
Claus |
Subject: |
Re: vc-git bug with top-level repositories |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:24:14 +0200 |
I see this behaviour as well (under Windows):
c:/work/foo/bar/somefile.xml is not recognized to be under GIT vc (but it is).
Whereas $HOME/.emacs is correctly recognized as being under GIT vc.
This used to work in my last build ~ the end of July, but doesn't work
now using:
GNU Emacs 23.0.60.1 (i386-mingw-nt6.0.6001) of 2008-08-17
If I can be of any more help in debugging this, let me know.
Claus
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden> wrote:
> "Alfred M. Szmidt" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > if you have git repository in e.g. /foo/.git then vc-mode stops
> > working. vc-mode also stops working if you have /.git.
> >
> > By stops working I mean that vc-mode does not detect that a file is
> > under VC, so you cannot do vc-print-log, vc-next-action, etc.
>
> A git repository in /foo/.git works fine for me with emacs from CVS head
> and EMACS_22_BRANCH.
>
> What version are you using? Can you try with emacs -Q?
- vc-git bug with top-level repositories, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/08/16
- Re: vc-git bug with top-level repositories, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/08/18
- Re: vc-git bug with top-level repositories,
Claus <=
- Re: vc-git bug with top-level repositories, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/08/18
- Re: vc-git bug with top-level repositories, Claus, 2008/08/18
- Re: vc-git bug with top-level repositories, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/08/18
- Re: vc-git bug with top-level repositories, Claus, 2008/08/19
- Re: vc-git bug with top-level repositories, Paul R, 2008/08/19
- Re: vc-git bug with top-level repositories, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/08/19
- Re: vc-git bug with top-level repositories, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/08/19
- Re: vc-git bug with top-level repositories, Andreas Schwab, 2008/08/19
- Re: vc-git bug with top-level repositories, Miles Bader, 2008/08/19
- Re: vc-git bug with top-level repositories, Paul R, 2008/08/20